Chisha v the people 1968

Author: mskr

August undefined, 2024

WebIn that judgment the appellant was convicted on a charge of defilement of a girl under the age of sixteen years, contrary to the provisions of section 138(1) of the Penal Code, … WebBENARD CHISHA v THE PEOPLE (1980) Z.R. 36 (S.C.) SUPREME COURT SILUNGWE, C.J., GARDNER, AG. D.C.J., AND CULLINAN, AG. J.S 10TH JULY, 28TH AUGUST …

Judiciary of Zambia

WebJudiciary of Zambia – Official website WebJul 17, 2024 · The appellant was convicted of indecent assault on a female. The complainant alleged that at 22 35 hours on 1st August, 1974, the appellant, who was … longwater drive norwell ma

Nyirenda v The People (SCZ Appeal 359 of 2013) [2014] ZMSC

Web(1) Where, in any proceedings against any person for any offence or in any civil proceedings, any child of tender years called as a witness does not, in the opinion of the court, understand the nature of an oath, his evidence may be received though not on oath, if, in the opinion of the court, he is possessed of sufficient intelligence to justify … WebThe People (2) where it was held that: "(i) A witness with a bias is not to be regarded as a witness with a purpose of his own to serve, but his evidence should be treated with caution and suspicion. (ii) Where a witness might have a purpose of his own to serve, the court must make a specific finding as to whether he is so regarded. WebJul 8, 2014 · See Chisha v The people 1968 See also Mwelwa Murono v The people, the court stated: ‘In criminal cases, the rule is that the legal burden of proving every element of the offence charged, and consequently the guilt of the accused, lies from beginning to end, on the prosecution. The standard of proof is high. longwater gravel companies house

Katebe v The People (1975) Z.R. 13 – Vigilante Scholar

WebA child of twelve years of age evidence and although the magistrate found that he was capable of giving evidence on oath, he did not consider him as a witness who required … WebBanda v The People Judgment No. 27 of 1966 (unreported). 3. Chisha v The People (1968) Z.R. 26. 4. Musonda v The People (1968) Z.R. 98. 5. Lungu v The People (1972) Z.R. 24. 6. People v Kamwandi (1972) Z.R. 131. 7. Chimbini v The People (1972) Z.R. 191. 8. Kampafwile v The People (1972) Z.R. 242. 9. Tiki and Others v The People (1975) … longwater construction supplies sleaford ltdWebChisha v The People ( 1968) ZR 191 2. Kateka v The People ( 1977) ZR 35 3. Nyambe v The People (1973) ZR 228 4. David Zulu v The People (1977) ZR 151 5. George Chileshe v The People (1977) ZR 235 -Reprint 6. Dorothy Mutale and Another v The People (1997) S.J 51 7. Gibrian Mweetwe v The People CAZ -Appeal No. 12 of 2024 ... long water drainage

"WebChisha Laurence Folotiya has been a leading and pioneering businessman in Zambia for the past 21 years. Educated in the UK, he graduated with a degree in Civil Engineering from Nottingham... " - Chisha v the people 1968

Chisha v the people 1968

WebJul 20, 2024 · The accused (Mwewa Murono) had allegedly killed a man who went by the name of Francis Mwewa (the deceased) on 19th July 2003. According to the witness … WebZulu v The People [1973] Z.R. 326 2. Emmanuel Phiri and Others v The People [1978] Z.R. 79 3. Saidi Banda v The People, Selected Judgment No. 30 of 2015 ... He then referred to the case of Bernard Chisha v The People5 and submitted that since corroborative evidence was required in this case, had a DNA test been carried out, it would have ...

Did you know?

Web6. Emmanuel Phiri v The People [1982] Z.R. 77 7. Liswaniso v The People [1976] Z.R. 277 S.Ilunga Kabala and John Masefu v The People [1981]Z.R. 102 9. Machipisha Kombe v The People [2009] Z.R. 282 LEGISLATION REFERRED TO: 1.The Penal Code, Chapter 87 of the Laws of Zambia 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This appeal emanates from the … WebTo hold otherwise would be to fly in the face of the plain meaning of the section and to defeat the object of Parliament, which is clearly, by creating the offence, to deter people …

WebParticulars of Offence: Abel Chisha, on the 17th February, 1968, at Kitwe in the Kitwe District of the Western Province of the Republic of Zambia, with intent to steal, broke into the dwelling house of Mary Jameson and stole therein six dresses, one suit, one jacket, one shopping bag, one pair of boots, one jersey, one pair of short trousers and … WebLENGALENGA, AG. JS, delivered the Judgment of the Court. Cases referred to: 1. EMMANUEL PHIRI v THE PEOPLE (1982) ZR 77 2. BERNARD CHISHA v THE PEOPLE (1980) ZR 36 3. EMMANUEL PHIRI & OTHERS v THE PEOPLE (1978) ZR 79 4. ZULU v THE PEOPLE (1973) ZR 326 5. GOBA v THE PEOPLE (1966) ZR 113 6. KATEBE v …

WebChisha v The People (19801 Z.R. 36 2. Emmanuel Phiri v The People (1982) Z.R. 77 3. Dorothy Mutale and Richard Phiri v The People (1997) Z.R. 227 ... In Bernard Chisha v The People1, which has been cited extensively by the defence, the main issue that arose was whether the sworn evidence of a child is to be treated like the sworn ... WebJul 17, 2024 · Facts The appellant was convicted of indecent assault on a female. The complainant alleged that at 22 35 hours on 1st August, 1974, the appellant, who was accompanied by a friend, knocked at the door of her house and when she opened the door he said that her younger sister wanted to see her.

WebIn that judgment the appellant was convicted on a charge of defilement of a girl under the age of sixteen years, contrary to the provisions of section 138(1) of the Penal Code, chapter 87 of the laws of Zambia as read with the Penal Code (Amendment) Act No. 15 of 2005 of the laws of Zambia.

WebDOROTHY MUTALE AND RICHARD PHIRI v THE PEOPLE (1997) S.J. 51 (S.C.) SUPREME COURT M.M.S. W. NGULUBE, C.J, SAKALA AND MUZYAMBA, JJ.S. 6TH MAY AND 12TH AUGUST, 1997 S.C.Z. JUDGMENT NO. 11 OF 1997 Flynote Criminal law - Inferences to be drawn - Inference drawn where nothing to exclude that longwater construction supplies norwichWeb(i)The evidence of all children who give evidence in court must be corroborated, Chisha v The People (1) followed. (ii)It is mandatory for a court to acquit an accused at the close of the prosecution case if the facts do not support the case against him, and no evidence that is led thereafter can remedy the deficiency in the prosecution evidence. longwater costesseyWeb1968. Chisha V People (HC 26 of 1968) [1968] ZMHC 5 (17 July 1968); Welcome to the new ZambiaLII website. Enjoy an improved search engine and new collections. If you are … longwater construction supplies sleafordWebParticulars of Offence: Abel Chisha, on the 17th February, 1968, at Kitwe in the Kitwe District of the Western Province of the Republic of Zambia, with intent to steal, broke into … longwater gravel patioWeb1. Chisha v The People ( 1968) ZR 191 2. Kateka v The People ( 1977) ZR 35 3. Nyambe v The People (1973) ZR 228 4. David Zulu v The People (1977) ZR 151 5. George … longwater farmWebApr 11, 2016 · 4th Track on Chisha's FAITHFUL Album hop off tourWebThe child fell on the fireplace. This happened in the presence of other people, who included PW3 and other young men who came to the place to drink beer. After the appellant’s assault on PW2’s son, she hit him with a piece of wood following which he ran away. longwater gravel attleborough