Dual license mit and gpl
WebJan 4, 2024 · JSXGraph is free software dual licensed under the GNU LGPL or MIT License. Dual licensed means that you can choose which license applies to you. ... As a summary I can select either the LGPL3.0 or later or the MIT license, plus the MIT license for ... since the LGPL 3.0 is an exception to the GPL 3.0, I may have additional … WebApr 11, 2024 · The spec file would have License: GPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT, not simply License: GPL-2.0-or-later. You have to include “MIT” even though some might argue that the executable is in some sense globally or “effectively” licensed under the GPL (for example, by virtue of GPLv2 section 2), or that file3.c gets implicitly sublicensed under …
Dual license mit and gpl
Did you know?
WebThe correct way of expressing that the module is dual licensed under a GPL v2 variant or MIT license choice. “Dual BSD/GPL” The module is dual licensed under a GPL v2 variant or BSD license choice. The exact variant of the BSD license can only be determined via the license information in the corresponding source files. “Dual MPL/GPL” WebThis is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. Some people call this license “the MIT License,” but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software. ... This is a free software license, compatible with the GPL via an explicit dual-licensing clause. SGI Free Software License ...
WebMay 7, 2010 · Many of the Dual Licenses state that the software is licensed using "MIT AND GPL". The "AND" is what confuses me. It seems to me that the word "AND" in the terms, means you will be licensing the product using both licenses. Most of the posts, here on stackoverflow, state that you can license the software using one "OR" the other. WebDec 7, 2016 · MIT&&GPL (you want the restrictions of all licenses to apply) => GPL (already include all of the restrictions) MIT GPL (you want people to choose, so you dual license) => MIT (there's no point in dual licensing, given GPL users can include MIT code anyway... jQuery in past was dual MIT/GPL and then moved to MIT only because of this …
WebApr 7, 2024 · Differences in distribution, linking, modification, private use of open source licenses like MIT, GNU GPL, Apache 2.0, Creative Commons, BSD licenses. WebMay 6, 2002 · If you’re submitting changes to an existing FLOSS project that uses a GPL-incompatible license, include a note in your submission that you’re dual-licensing your changes with a GPL-compatible license (such as the GPL, LGPL, or MIT/X license); that will make it much easier for the project to dual-license the entire program later.
WebSep 24, 2016 · If you have a dual licensed GPL + Proprietary licensed project, and someone contributes a GPL licensed contribution to your GPL project. Can your proprietary project still make use of the GPLed contribution without the GPL contribution infecting the proprietary portions?
WebHowever, copyleft-next 0.3.1 says: "If the Derived Work includes material licensed under the GPL, You may instead license the Derived Work under the GPL." "GPL" is defined to include GPLv2. In practice this means copyleft-next code in Linux may be licensed under the GPL2, however there are additional obvious gains for bringing contributins from ... push garden row makerWebI would add a switch in the build system to enable/disable the component of my software that relies on GPLed 3rd party code and document that, if the user builds the software with that option enabled, then she must choose the GPL license. Otherwise, she is able to choose whichever license she likes. Would that be a suitable course of action? secy night gownsWebThe MIT (Expat) license places a few restrictions on you. These are a subset of the GPL license. Therefore, if you relicense the code under the GPL, and keep the MIT notice, then you've satisfied the terms of the MIT license and may legally redistribute the code. push gas mower sale clearanceWebThis software is licensed under a dual license system (MIT or GPL version 2). This means you are free to choose with which of both licenses (MIT or GPL version 2) you want to use this library. The license texts of the MIT license … push gas lawn mowers with jet engineWebI saw this rbtree implementation is famous and widely mentioned but its usage is limited by its GPL license. ... etc. Would then it be possible to release rbtree under a dual license more permissive, e.g. MIT ? Be sure this would be very appreciated by a lot of C programmers ! This comes down to modyfy the SPDX descriptions of lib/rbtree.c and ... push gaming slots bestWebThe correct way of expressing that the module is dual licensed under a GPL v2 variant or MIT license choice. “Dual BSD/GPL” The module is dual licensed under a GPL v2 … push gas lawn mower for saleWebNov 23, 2014 · The BlockUI plugin is dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses. ... The MIT license is recommended for most projects because it is simple and easy to understand and it places almost no restrictions on what you can do with the plugin. If the GPL suits your project better you are also free to use the plugin under that license. push gas lawn mower best rated